The more you do, the more you do

-
I've been so prolific lately. I didn't expect that to be an outcome of my daily painting - my intention was to get better and get in more hours of painting - though in hindsight, it is obvious that I would produce something. It is a great feeling - the flow of one painting after another. Many days, I practice small studies or techniques, and many times, those studies are good enough to frame. I love it when that happens. It is when I am practicing that I do my best work.
These irises were done en plein air last Thursday at Nola's Iris Garden in San Jose - in the order that I painted the three. I almost didn't go, knowing that it would be all florals, but I am so glad I did - I have never seen that many colors or color combinations in a single species. I have been doing florals lately just to get out of the box, and I thought they would be easy - they are organically shaped, mistakes can be hidden in flowers. But just because I can paint the flower doesn't mean I make a good painting. For that, something else needs to happen. Recently, during my second weekend in SVOS, I was speaking with someone about beauty in a painting and they asked me whether my needing to own that painting meant I valued it, or saw beauty in it. I agreed - that seemed reasonable. If I was willing to part with my money for it, it must mean it has value to me. But a few minutes later, I realized - no, that is not entirely true. For me to see beauty in a painting, what is true for me is that the painting needs to be more beautiful than the subject. There must be some interpretation, some liberty with color choices, something the artist brings of him/herself for it to be a thing of beauty. (And that is why photorealism doesn't appeal to me at all). I may choose not to spend X amount to own something I find beautiful - I don't think I am one to need possessions and that sort of attachment - but I need to be moved by the painting. Something ordinary, like a concrete/aggregate factory may look ugly to the normal viewer, but if the artist paints it and makes it a thing of beauty, it has succeeded and is beautiful. The best compliment then would be that the viewer never thought "this could look that interesting."





All this talk of beauty reminds me of a lovely poem by Mirza Ghalib that often comes to mind when I see beauty:



Sab kahan, kuchh lala-o-gul mein numaya ho gaye
Khaak mein kya soorte hongin ki pinha ho gaye.

Where are they all? Some bloom again as tulips or as roses
There in the dust forever how many forms lie concealed!
(TRANSLATED BY RALPH RUSSELL)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Connected shadows

-
Image
I have often passed by the Campbell Community Center/Heritage Theater and been struck by the beautiful Spanish Colonial Revival architecture with intricate ornamentation. Finally, I had the opportunity to paint it today with the SCVWS Thursday plein air group. I think I should have used a ruler for this as some of my verticals aren't parallel to the edge of the paper! I do like the purple/blue shadows and how the colored shadows blend into one another around all the bright white areas. As always, for me, greens are troublesome - they often look overworked in my paintings. But, I am pleased with this overall.                       “One Ticket, Please”
Read more

Faith vs. belief, and inspiration

-
Image
In yesterday's Gita session, we discussed the difference between belief and faith. I found myself saying that a belief was hard-edged and inflexible, and faith all-encompassing and flexible and always positive - akin to having a big-picture trust in the cosmos. When I heard myself say "hard-edged," it made me realize how many terms and ideas are so interchangeable between the world of watercolor (art) and spirituality (life). When edges are hard, the eye stops at each edge before it goes to the next "item." It's like stop-and-go traffic. You are making progress but it is not smooth, not a flow. When edges are soft, your eyes travel easily, from one object to the next because the divisions between the objects are blurred, and the values do the talking. It is like life, like consciousness. We are all one - not so hard-edged and separate - yet we don't know it, and bump up against one another because of our hard edges, fixed ideas and notions, prejudices an
Read more

Design- vs. content-driven

-
Image
I've found that strong design-driven art is more attractive to me than content-driven paintings. Of course, the content or subject is there (unless it is truly non-representational work), but it is realized and recognized a split second after one has responded to the design. For this reason, subjects that lend themselves to being more easily abstracted - interiors, close-ups of anything, still life cropped just so - are more appealing than standard impressionistic distant landscapes where the shapes themselves tell you sky-earth-mountains-lake. A landscape can also be abstracted but I feel there is more effort in hiding or veiling landscape features for the slow reveal to happen. I've been working on this still life, and just starting with a notan helped me understand and crop shapes right away. Pushing some of the lighter shapes to the white of the paper helps with abstraction. Like a chess board where each shape is bordered by a contrasting value shape, or the way we typicall
Read more